Give us a call: (09) 486 4719
btn book free consultation


Email me when new posts are made to this blog

Labour proposal to ringfence losses

September 19th, 2017.

Labour has targeted investors in its housing policy released. Ringfencing tax losses, five-year bright line rules and a tax committee (to mask their desire to bring in capital gains tax) are all on their agenda.



  • Ringfenced tax losses derived from negative gearing will mean you can’t get tax refunds from negative cash flow investments. (This is poorly thought through policy in my view, for reasons discussed below)
  • Labour will extend bright line rules to five years, meaning if you sell residential property within five years, you will have to pay tax on gains unless it is your home. (I am a fan of this, as it will curtail speculators and encourage long-term investment.)
  • If they get in, Labour intend to convene a tax committee post-election to see what they think the fairest tax system is. (In other words, they don’t want to admit that they intend to bring in capital gains tax because they lost the last election (partially) on this unpopular policy, so they are feigning a review to defer the decision to bring in CGT until after the election. Do they really think we are this gullible?)


Five-year bright-line rules

As said, I think they are on to something with this policy. I see lots of investors intending to keep property for two years and then sell. I think this policy will weed out the speculators and move the market towards genuine long-term investment, removing the inevitable grey area that IRD will face with investors that sell after two years. I think it is fair policy in a tax base that has no capital gains tax. So they get a tick from me here.


Ringfenced losses

Ringfencing losses is interesting, because one would think that Labour voters are well represented in property investment circles, carrying lots of debt (and investment property) with the Kiwi dream of making money through leveraged capital growth very alive in the lower socioeconomic population. Integral to this is the knowledge that if interest rates spike, they get some tax relief in a down market (driven by high interest rates) but conversely, they will pay tax when rents go up and their investments turn tax positive in the longer term.

Rich people don’t care so much about spikes in interest rates because they carry less debt and often sit on cash, so they actually enjoy interest rate spikes.

Denying tax credits to negative gearing therefore bites families regressively, in that it impacts on the middle to lower income earners much harder than the wealthy. Plainly if you are poorer and carry more debt, and have less wealth to insulate you from interest rate spikes, then you need the tax credits more to survive. So people with less wealth playing in property circles stand to have their cash flow affected much more (relatively speaking) than the wealthy. They just don’t have the income surpluses to prop up their houses.

I therefore found it odd that Mr Little was saying he was targeting the ‘big investors’. The big investors are big for a reason. They are wealthy, get the funding because they have the income to support the debt, and therefore are less likely to be vulnerable to these tax changes.


Impact dangerous to poorer people in downturn

But this policy's outcome is worse than just merely ‘impacting’ the poorer investors’ cash flow. It can ruin them and make them victims of the wealthy they compete with in the housing market.

Say interest rates spike because Trump does something to trigger banking instability. For example, he starts a war. Under Labour’s suggested policy, less affluent people with lots of debt won’t be able to get cash flow relief through tax refunds. So, they’ll go broke in the credit-driven downturn, be forced to sell at the bottom of the market, and see rich people buy all their assets at the worst time for them. A bunch of good honest Kiwis trying to get ahead get screwed by this new policy in a down market. Furthermore, often small businesses are funded by security over property, so they’ll likely turn belly-up also.


When will these rules bite?

The impact would really bite when interest rates rise, not at present where rates are at historically low levels and most investors are tax neutral or near to it as a result.

You need to roll this forward a few years. If interest rates go up 3% and you owe $2 million, that's an extra $60,000 you need to find to fund your rental investments. Ringfenced losses mean you don't get $20,000 (33%) tax relief to soften the blow. So this will make a lot of heavily geared investors more insolvent (if they get caught out without fixed rate agreements) than otherwise would occur under current tax policy.

With the increased risk to private investors, the impact is a potential decrease in activity in the market, which leads to less properties being built. This is bad for Auckland house supply, because we desperately require more housing stock. You have got to wonder if Labour see this link, or are they just looking at the current interest rates and tax policy at a given point in time?

Labour just don't understand money and finance. They are great at social policy, but they seem to let Envy Politics cloud their decision-making and produce unpopular tax policy in recent times.

They are trying to tax the rich and look innovative and relevant. But actually, this is an ill-conceived policy that screws their constituents, despite the stated target being the ‘big guys’. Time will tell as to whether mainstream New Zealanders share Mr Little’s enthusiasm to punish property investors and favour first homeowners, but I for one think he is playing with fire in his voter base. As Labour found out in the last election in 2014, Kiwis don’t like governments mucking around with the taxation of housing. It may be that we see a similar backlash in this election; certainly most property investors will not be voting Labour!

This blog has covered Labour’s position, and as National’s position emerges, we will cover that as well, if there is anything of interest.

To contact Matthew and the team at GRA, please fill out the form below:


Matthew Lily says ...
I simply reckoned it is an outline to share in case other companies was first experiencing difficulty looking for still Now i'm a small amount of doubting generally if i here's permitted to use artists and additionally explains relating to right. Capital Gains Tax
Angela lee Lynch says ...
This is exactly likewise a terrific print which we honestly dearly loved looking through. It's not actually day by day that we include the risk to figure out an item. Perspex Holder
Farhan Malik says ...
While i attained on the web site though setting awareness just a little small amount submits. Satisfying way of long lasting, I shall be book-marking at the same time get varieties comprehensive occurs up. gaigoihanoi
上門開鎖 says ...
I favor a variety of blogposts, My spouse and i really appreciated, I need specifics of the idea, considering that it's very amazing., Kind regards associated with providing. 上門開鎖
RT says ...
Fast this approach awesome websites will probably irrefutably you should be known amongst a large number of making a fabulous web page persons, as thorough content and articles combined with past customer testimonials. putlocker
RT says ...
Fast this approach awesome websites will probably irrefutably you should be known amongst a large number of making a fabulous web page persons, as thorough content and articles combined with past customer testimonials. putlocker
BG says ...
Body of water get on your site though making use of detect merely merely a certain amount of part submits. Comforting technique for not to distant future, We are book-marking right now get variations accomplish occurs out. <a href=";&#x5D9;&#x5E0;&#x5D9;-&#x5DE;&#x5E9;&#x5E4;&#x5D7;&#x5D4;">עו"ד ירושות</a>
DFC says ...
Quite simply this page would most likely the most impressive sparkle in some cases come to be widely recognized relating various blog customers, now for the aware articles or blog posts or perhaps it is thoughts and opinions. 123movies
sam harries says ...
Accept paid for with the assistance of focus, have found present day society; accepted that secure on your playlists, you could conceivably know the vast majority of the problem; expected ones stage quit, significantly more can't drive; Imagine I might want revere, just the stroke. energy comparsion site
mahnoor says ...
Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti (NVS) is going to release the Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Result 2020 very soon on its official website.Navodaya Result 2020 Bhopal JNVST Result will be announced for the Class 6 exam (Phase 1) conducted on January 11, 2020. We will provide you the direct link to download the JNVST Class 6 Result in this article, once released.
paul says ...
I hope most of you guys have heard of this platform but let me ensure you that it is one of the best ones. The platform of the is very good at delivering their services and it is highly recommended to use. I personally find it very effective.
LEGEND SEO says ...
I am very enjoyed for this blog. Its an informative topic. It help me very much to solve some problems. Its opportunity are so fantastic and working style so speedy. putlocker
sk says ...
This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing blog that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. เมล็ดกาแฟ
Mobocial says ...
<a href="">رنگ اپوکسی بهداشتی</a>
Mobocial says ...
<a href="">رنگ اپوکسی بهداشتی</a>
Mobocial says ...
<a href="">رنگ اپوکسی بهداشتی</a>
Mobocial says ...
فروش ویلا در کلاردشت


“ *As a rule, we advise that you contact us as early as possibly to secure the most suitable time for your consultation.
Product Query

First Name*


Kris Pedersen Mortgages Limited

+64 9 486 4719
Skype: Kris_Pedersen    
Takapuna Office
388 Lake Road
Auckland 0622
Newmarket Office
Level 6
135 Broadway
Auckland 1023
Postal Address
PO Box 33650
Auckland 0740